> I am very confuse is java 100% pure object oriented
> language.
>bcoz
> 1)object oriented means everything should be in
> object but
>primitive data type is not object.
Yeah, discussed a lot. So call it 98% pure if you want.
> 2) java don't support multiple inheritances which is
> one of the oop 's
>concept
There are all kinds of other reasons you could come up with, why pick MI?
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=684554&start=0&tstart=0
http://www.whysmalltalk.com/articles/panici/smalloojava.htm
search around these fora for more discussion
> I am very confuse is java 100% pure object oriented
> language.
>bcoz
> 1)object oriented means everything should be in
> object but
>primitive data type is not object.
> 2) java don't support multiple inheritances which is
> one of the oop 's
>concept
Does it make any difference to the world one way or another?