I see. Too urgent to invest two seconds in a bloody search,, and instead pester us with a question that's asked twice a week.
http://onesearch.sun.com/search/onesearch/index.jsp?qt=Why+Java+is+not+a+fully+Object+Oriented+Language&col=developer-forums&subCat=siteforumid%3Ajava31&site=dev&dftab=siteforumid%3Ajava31&chooseCat=javaall&cs=false&rt=true
Hi guys
Actually the Object oriented programming is not a language its a mathametical concept.based on this concept we are bulding the languages .i think "Ruby on rails " is mostly(not 100%) OOP Based.
Ok for our Question
================
Certainly java is not fully object oriented.
There may be 2 reasons
1.It does nt Support Multiple inherietrence in java
2.we cant create objects for the primitive Data types
So i think java is not a fully object oriented.............
Is it Dead Thread day?
> There may be 2 reasons
> 1.It does nt Support Multiple inherietrence in java
Yes it does
> 2.we cant create objects for the primitive Data
> types
You have wrapper objects for primitive types. (It is the fact you have primitives in the first place which is the "problem")
.............. Much noledge updation is required..............
................thread two new to be resurected , plz wait 18 mnths , standard sub continent thread ressurection time....................
pls fix auto repeat on fullstop key.......................................................