Is java purely object oriented?
Please don't shot me...I'm having this doubt. because there are primitive datatypes in java which are not objectsand also a java program is not an object of any class.its started from main..Please give ur comments
I shot the santhoshyma but I did not shoot the deputy
For the love of god search the forums.Someone argues this every day.AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS: ITS NOT A DOUBT ITS A QUESTION!
The answer to your question is the same that it always is. No, Java is not a pure OO language. The inclusion of primitive types breaks pure OO but was done as a compromise for performance and some might argue elegance and usability as well.Anyway that clears your doubt enough.
I shot the santhoshyma but I did not shoot the deputy ...I swear it was TuringPest
thank you cotton u answered my question.but i didnt understand the comment
> thank you cotton u answered my question.> > but i didnt understand the commentThere was once was a song... and your comment reminded me of it. It didn't mean anything. Don't sweat it.
here are just a few of your friends with doubts
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=31&threadID=684554
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=31&threadID=654131
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=31&threadID=640954
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=513&threadID=557085
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=48&threadID=713100
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=513&threadID=240687
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=256&threadID=140129
http://forum.sun.com/jive/thread.jspa?forumID=123&threadID=57181
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=32&threadID=572306
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=31&threadID=692938
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=256&threadID=217525
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=54&threadID=749025
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=54&threadID=735737
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=54&threadID=748385
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=513&threadID=373267
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=256&threadID=341219
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=256&threadID=324608
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=256&threadID=477776
> here are just a few of your friends with doubts> So what. Who cares. It won't make any difference. The next person won't search either. Some people do search and some people don't but either way you won't be changing anyones behaviour. Trust me.
You misunderstand cotton.m, ive actually completely snapped and i now collect thread links and rock back and forth in my chair mumbling to myself and drooling on my keyboard : )its as good a hobby as any?
> You misunderstand cotton.m, ive actually completely
> snapped and i now collect thread links and rock back
> and forth in my chair mumbling to myself and drooling
> on my keyboard
Then you are in the wrong thread. Please try this one instead http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=750963&tstart=0
i will add that to my collection.
To both of u.I'm new to this forums and all.Thats y posted the same question.Sorry if i wasted ur time.
> To both of u.> Why are you mad at me? I answered your question. Sheesh. Relax buddy. Seriously.
> I'm new to this forums and all.This forum is like pretty much every other forum on the web. They all expect people to search first before asking.
> > I'm new to this forums and all.> > This forum is like pretty much every other forum on> the web. They all expect people to search> first before asking.and to not crosspost...
> > > I'm new to this forums and all.
> >
> > This forum is like pretty much every other forum
> on
> > the web. They all expect people to search
> > first before asking.
>
> and to not crosspost...
JavaRanch?
> Please give ur comments
Random quotes from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur
"Ur is considered by many to be the city of Ur Kasdim mentioned in the Book of Genesis as the birthplace of the patriarch Abram (Abraham). This identification is, however, disputed."
"After Taylor's time the site was visited by numerous travelers, almost all of whom have found ancient Babylonian remains, inscribed stones and the like, lying upon the surface. The site was considered rich in remains, and relatively easy to explore."
"There is no modern village at Ur, so it has never received many tourist visitors"
Enjoy.
> You misunderstand cotton.m, ive actually completely> snapped and i now collect thread links and rock back> and forth in my chair mumbling to myself and drooling> on my keyboard : )You've turned into yawmark!~
> You've turned into yawmark!I hate us!
> I hate us!That's okay. I've got enough love to go around*.* Not like that.
> For the love of god search the forums.> Someone argues this every day.> > AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS: ITS NOT A DOUBT ITS A QUESTION!Hehe! Doubting Thomases.