Home.... | log in.... | Pub my question! | Sign-up....

Do I have to use RMI

In my application I need to expose a class which needs to continously run in the background(in a seperate thread). I need to access methods in the constantly running class from other classes in the same application. The application is a single box application and not distributed. What is the best way of implementing this? Is RMI a good way of doing this?

[372 byte] By [dan_aravinda] at [2007-10-3 4:28:16]

«« Confused about passing by reference and passing by valule
»» Compilation Error

# 1

The R in RMI stands for Remote. If you're on a single box, you have no remote app. Thus, you just need to spawn a thread. RMI is for distributed programming.

SoulTech2012a at 2007-7-14 22:31:13 >

Core New Topic

Transfer Data
JMX monitor / notification / attribute and my own object
Entity Beans: equals and hashCode methods
Missing Data-member typ in Serialization
Problem in socket
How to check whether the file is a directory or not?
Image Loading Issue in JSP
Simple concurrency issue

Core Hot Topic

HashMap.values() question
0x3F character on the first line when reading Unicode files
Best collection for sorted, changing list?
Image transform over network
RMI client execution leads to AccessControlException/ClassNotFoundException
Basic Beginner Question about RMI
RFE: Delegate Annotation
Servlet Destroy() Methods

Java programming resources: FAQs, tutorials, compiler and browser download sites, documentation, books lists, IDEs, etc.

Do I have to use RMI

Core New Topic

Core Hot Topic

Core

All Classified