problem with log4j.properties and level DEBUG
Hi,
I need some log4j help.
I create 2 different appenders in the log4j.properties file
and it works.
This is my complete log4j.properties:
log4j.logger.log1=DEBUG, log1
log4j.logger.log2=DEBUG, log2
log4j.appender.log1=org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.log1.File=${StandardLogPath}
log4j.appender.log1.DatePattern='.'yyyy-MM-dd
log4j.appender.log1.Append=true
#log4j.appender.log1.Threshold=DEBUG
log4j.appender.log1.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.log1.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss} [%-5p] %-25c{1} %m%n
log4j.appender.log2=org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.log2.File=${StandardLogQueryPath}
log4j.appender.log2.DatePattern='.'yyyy-MM-dd
log4j.appender.log2.Append=true
log4j.appender.log2.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.log2.layout.ConversionPattern=%d{dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss} [%-5p] %-25c{1} %m%n
And here's my logging code:
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
Logger log = Logger.getLogger("log1");
Logger logQuery = Logger.getLogger("log2");
log.debug("loggerDebug");
logQuery.debug("loggerDebug");
log.info("loggerInfo");
logQuery.info("loggerInfo");
The problem is that "loggerDebug" is not written to all appenders (only "loggerInfo").
In fact if I print:
System.out.println( log.getEffectiveLevel().toString() );
result that the level is INFO and I known that if level is INFO then DEBUG is disable.
But why the level is INFO?
Someone can suggest me a solution?
Thank you very much
[2291 byte] By [
cricclaa] at [2007-10-2 22:33:29]
> I know that it seems impossible but I'm running with
> the configuration I've posted, I'm sure!
> I've also thought about a problem of version (I'm
> using log4j 1.2.8) but it seems strange..
> I don't know just what to think.
> Do you have any idea?
If you haven't already...
To be doubly sure, change that file so that the appenders write to some OTHER file names instead of what they are currently writing to. Rerun your test, and ensure they actually write to the other files.
> Or you could just be a flake and never reply back as
> to the progress or lack thereof of the issue.
You're so over-sensitive you: when an OP doesn't respond anymore to
your last reply it implies that you've solved the problem and (implicitly)
that the OP is very grateful to you. Why do you always have to be so
explicit about matters? ;-)
kind regards,
Jos
ps. There are nice exception to the rule sometimes though.
> You're so over-sensitive you: when an OP doesn't
> respond anymore to
> your last reply it implies that you've solved the
> problem and (implicitly)
> that the OP is very grateful to you. Why do you
> always have to be so
> explicit about matters? ;-)
Because I'm not one of those Dutch people ;-)
>
> kind regards,
>
> Jos
>
> ps. There are nice exception to the rule sometimes
> though.
Yes, and unfortunately they do seem to be the exception rather than the rule. It would be nice to catch one a bit more often.
> > You're so over-sensitive you: when an OP doesn't respond anymore
> > to your last reply it implies that you've solved the problem and
> > (implicitly) that the OP is very grateful to you. Why do you always
> > have to be so explicit about matters? ;-)
> Because I'm not one of those Dutch people ;-)
Yes, that's us, the Dutch: mysteriously smiling and keeping silent all the
time. That's why they call us the Asians of Western Europe ;-)
> > ps. There are nice exception to the rule sometimes though.
> Yes, and unfortunately they do seem to be the exception rather than
> the rule. It would be nice to catch one a bit more often.
True; that's the internet generation: grab all the information that you can
and don't give a f*ck about the guy who supplied the information. It's sad
indeed.
Maybe we should start a support group where we could thank each
other now and then 'on behalf' of those little spoiled brats and complain
about all those bad manners nowadays ;-)
kind regards,
Jos
