> Your question is ambiguious since you don't define a
> mapping from integers to chars but it may be as simple as
>
> char yourIntegerAsChar = (char)yourInteger;
Shouldn't you be working on that humongous two's complement application? ;-)
kind regards,
Jos
> > Shouldn't you be working on that humongous two's complement application? ;-)
>
> I'm well ahead of my self imposed deadline and I felt the need for a break!
Ok, granted, but only if you're definitely absolutely positively sure that that jdbc
connection pooling scheme is two's complement compatible ;-)
kind regards,
Jos (multi tier two's complement project manager)
> Ok, granted, but only if you're definitely absolutely
> positively sure that that jdbc
> connection pooling scheme is two's complement
> compatible ;-)
I'm using the Snark approach as defined by Lewis and Caroll. I then don't require a two's complement connection pool. I can make do with one's complement which, as you are aware, has no negative connotation.
> > Ok, granted, but only if you're definitely
> absolutely
> > positively sure that that jdbc
> > connection pooling scheme is two's complement
> > compatible ;-)
>
> I'm using the Snark approach as defined by Lewis and
> Caroll. I then don't require a two's complement
> connection pool. I can make do with one's complement
> which, as you are aware, has no negative connotation.
Uh, I think that is the Lewis and Clark approach, defined by their native American guide, Jabberwocky, as they approached the Pacific Ocean.
Get it straight.
World spins
RD-R
?{?
> > > Ok, granted, but only if you're definitely absolutely
> > > positively sure that that jdbc
> > > connection pooling scheme is two's complement
> > > compatible ;-)
> >
> > I'm using the Snark approach as defined by Lewis and
> > Caroll. I then don't require a two's complement
> > connection pool. I can make do with one's complement
> > which, as you are aware, has no negative connotation.
>
> Uh, I think that is the Lewis and Clark
> approach, defined by their native American guide,
> Jabberwocky, as they approached the Pacific Ocean.
>
> Get it straight.
Nononono; you must get it straight: as everybody well knows the Lewis/Clark
approach suffers from negative zeros in their one complement scheme; that's
why the latest JTCAPI abondoned it in their final draft proposed at the JCP#56632
sabre and I are right and you are dead wrong; so there :-P
kind regards,
Jos
> Nononono; you must get it straight: as everybody well
> knows the Lewis/Clark
> approach suffers from negative zeros in their one
> complement scheme; that's
> why the latest JTCAPI abondoned it in their final
> draft proposed at the JCP#56632
>
> sabre and I are right and you are dead wrong; so
> there :-P
>
> kind regards,
>
> Jos
I'll never never never never never never never believe you, no matter how many times you **** oligarchs post the truth, no matter how many times you back it up with supporting references. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I CAN'T HEEEAAAR YOUUUU!
World spins
RD-R
?{?
> I'll never never never never never never never believe you, no matter how many
> times you **** oligarchs post the truth, no matter how many times you back it
> up with supporting references. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I CAN'T HEEEAAAR YOUUUU!
How typical; just wait 'till Sabre finishes his multi-tier, multi-user, multi-threaded,
pre-emptive, highly scalable two's complement operating system wrapper.
It'll be finished this Tuesday morning; under my strict supervision that is :-P
kind regards,
Jos (project manager)
> > It'll be finished this Tuesday morning; under my strict supervision that is :-P
>
> Typical project manager! Ready to take all the credit if I succeed but I bet I get the blame if I fail!
Nononono, don't be afraid; I'm different, i.e. if you don't fail I take the blame and
if you don't succeed you can have all the credit. And vice versa of course ;-)
Now chopchop, we both have work to do, I need my power point presentation
to be finished by this Tuesday morning too you know! ;-)
kind regards,
Jos (new age project people manager)
> > Just a thought. Should one write two's complement,
> > twos complement or twos' complement? All seem
> wrong!
>
> After further thought. Since it can be thought of as
> possessive (belonging to two) it is probably two's.
The majority of Google's (sic) hits came up with "two's complement" or "2's complement".
An incidental "twos complement" was just a minority. It, indeed, is the genitivus
the 'belonging to' form, hence the apostrophe-s form.
kind regards,
Jo's'
> > > Just a thought. Should one write two's
> complement,
> > > twos complement or twos' complement? All seem
> > wrong!
> >
> > After further thought. Since it can be thought of
> as
> > possessive (belonging to two) it is probably
> two's.
>
> The majority of Google's (sic) hits came up with
> "two's complement" or "2's complement".
> An incidental "twos complement" was just a minority.
> It, indeed, is the genitivus
> the 'belonging to' form, hence the apostrophe-s
> form.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Jo's'
Well, we'll just see what Strunk and White has to say about that!
World spins
RD-R
{