About websphere

Where should I place the war file in Websphere server?

[61 byte] By [uk0102a] at [2007-11-27 11:53:33]
# 1

Use the admin console to deploy it. And read the manual next time.

CeciNEstPasUnProgrammeura at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 2

and if i'm not mistaken, you'll need an ear, it won't accept a war file (pretty sure)

SoulTech2012a at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 3

Of course you can deploy a war file to Websphere (and any J2EE application server - it's part of the spec)

tsitha at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 4

it's possible to deploy a WAR on WebSphere, but not recommended by IBM ... Been a while since I've used websphere but I do recall an option to deploy only a WAR.

m_roznera at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 5

Could you point me to where IBM doesn't recommend deploying WARs to WebSphere? 'cause I can think of a couple past clients that would be most interested to read that.

Google led me to here:

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/wasce/V1.0.0.1/Reference/Commands/deploy.html

And I don't see where IBM recommends against this. Nor can I find any such recommendation in the relevant redbooks.

tsitha at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 6

> Of course you can deploy a war file to Websphere (and

> any J2EE application server - it's part of the spec)

You obviously aren't familiar with IBM's practices. :-)

SoulTech2012a at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 7

well... perhaps a poor choice of words there, the server fully supports deploying a WAR and it will work just fine, but "IBM practices" would encourage you to put everything into an EAR.

m_roznera at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 8

> well... perhaps a poor choice of words there, the

> server fully supports deploying a WAR and it will

> work just fine, but "IBM practices" would encourage

> you to put everything into an EAR.

Can you please point me to these "IBM practices" which encourage web applications to be packaged as EAR files?

tsitha at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 9

I'm not going to search the earth to find out exactly which version of websphere it was or what not. but i didn't just make this up. of course i know the spec says you can create a war. but as i recall a particular version of websphere would neither produce nor consume a war file because it was retarded.

SoulTech2012a at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 10

> I'm not going to search the earth to find out exactly

> which version of websphere it was or what not. but i

> didn't just make this up. of course i know the spec

> says you can create a war. but as i recall a

> particular version of websphere would neither produce

> nor consume a war file because it was retarded.

k. It is my hope that m_rozner's memory is better. So, you're telling me that some version of the WebSphere application server could not deploy a WAR, but rather would deploy an EAR, which is simply a WAR and some jars bundled together with an extra xml file or two?

Interesting.

tsitha at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 11

> Interesting.

No, retarded.

SoulTech2012a at 2007-7-29 18:50:55 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...