Home.... | log in.... | Pub my question! | Sign-up....
Java-index >> Security >> Cryptography

Alternative to JMF

1> Is there any alternative to Java Media Framework2> JMF is live or dead.
[94 byte] By [yogeshjoshijia] at [2007-11-27 9:30:09]
«« Download and Support change
»» Installing Java stuido on linux...
# 1
No one there to answer my queyr
yogeshjoshijia at 2007-7-12 22:40:44 > top of Java-index,Security,Cryptography...
# 2
there is an open-source project called FMJ that's in the works, but you'll find even less information about that online than JMF.
msavourya at 2007-7-12 22:40:44 > top of Java-index,Security,Cryptography...
# 3
> No one there to answer my queyrMaybe the level of enthusiastic response was influenced by the number of dukes offered..In any case, besides FMJ, my answers would be:-1) Java Media Components (JMC) in Java 72) Seems so.
AndrewThompson64a at 2007-7-12 22:40:44 > top of Java-index,Security,Cryptography...
# 4
thanks for ur suggestion
yogeshjoshijia at 2007-7-12 22:40:44 > top of Java-index,Security,Cryptography...
# 5
Is there any way to use RTP protocol without JMF.Is it necessary to install JMF on client side if my applet is using JMF.Actually i don't want to install on client m/c is it possible.
yogeshjoshijia at 2007-7-12 22:40:44 > top of Java-index,Security,Cryptography...
# 6

> Is there any way to use RTP protocol without JMF.

Yes/no/depends.

Yes. Whatever solution you settle for,

must provide the class/code/functionality

to do RTP.

No. JMF implements RTP, but a project does

not need the entire JMF, just to use the the

RTP classes - try running the customizer.jar

to see very much smaller deployment files.

Depends. Not if you choose to go the 'native

player' route, which will give far less control,

but greater power.

> Is it necessary to install JMF on client side if my

> applet is using JMF.

Download yes - but there are better alternatives to

the traditional 'installer'. I prefer to deploy JMF using

Java Web Start. Here are some of my JMF/JWS

examples..

http://www.javasaver.com/testjs/jmf/#test3

Note they are all 'full permissions', and deploy the

entire JMF, but I suspect

1) you might be able to get away with a

sandboxed app., if the RTP streams are

coming from the same server as the one

it was launched from

2) The customizer would reduce the download

size significanlty (for machines with broad enough

connections to make RTP practical - should have

no problem with code download).

> Actually i don't want to install on client m/c is it

> possible.

The JMF installer is very 'noisy' isn't it?

I especially got worried when it recommended to

reboot the computer. Reboot the computer, to

see a JMF applet? You must be kidding?!

Note that JMF works just fine without reboot

on Win XP - I specifically tested it - but that does

not remove the message, or the worry for the

end user.

Try the JWS based install, remember it can be

made smaller and probably sandboxed (no

security prompt), and ask yourself if that is

something your end user might accept...

"Click a link, see a 'loading' splash, see media

on-screen"

AndrewThompson64a at 2007-7-12 22:40:44 > top of Java-index,Security,Cryptography...
# 7

thanks for u reply,

i wright a code which use java sound api without using JMF, to get sound from microphone and play back the same sound which i received from microphone. so what i want to send that capture sound over network using RTP and get sound from network using RTP.

Actually i don't want to install JMF on client m/c and when i test my code, code implemented using JMF, On client side i m able to capture any device using

AudioFormat format =new AudioFormat(AudioFormat.LINEAR,8000,16,1);

CaptureDeviceManager.getDeviceList(format);

Reason is that on client m/c JMF is not installed when i installed JMF on client M/C my code is able to capture client device

Thanks,

yogeshjoshijia at 2007-7-12 22:40:44 > top of Java-index,Security,Cryptography...
Security
Cryptography

Security Hot Topic

Security

All Classified