Differences between primary types and wrapes

Hi,

I am developing an two applications that change information over RMI, i can use primitive types, like long, boolean, int or wrapes of primary types like Long, Boolean, Integer

Beacuse both types are serializable, but i dont nkow what type must i use, somebody can explain me what is the best from the point of view of the performance and serialization?

thanks

[388 byte] By [kerulea] at [2007-11-27 5:05:29]
# 1
The primitives, usually, unless you have a reason to use a wrapper.
CeciNEstPasUnProgrammeura at 2007-7-12 10:23:57 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 2

> The primitives, usually, unless you have a reason to use a wrapper.

I would have said "...unless you absolutely have to." Autoboxing encourages the illusion that primitives and wrapper objects are interchangeable, and that's a dangerous illusion. Consider this example: import java.util.*;

public class Test

{

public static void main(String... args) throws Exception

{

List<Integer> intList = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 300, 400);

int a = 1;

Integer b = 2;

int c = 300;

Integer d = 400;

System.out.printf("%3d == %3d: %b%n", a, intList.get(0),

a == intList.get(0));

System.out.printf("%3d == %3d: %b%n", b, intList.get(1),

b == intList.get(1));

System.out.printf("%3d == %3d: %b%n", c, intList.get(2),

c == intList.get(2));

System.out.printf("%3d == %3d: %b%n", d, intList.get(3),

d == intList.get(3));

}

}

Output: 1 ==1: true

2 ==2: true

300 == 300: true

400 == 400: false In some cases, == is comparing two ints; in others, two objects. If you use primitives and wrappers interchangeably without appreciating the distinction, you'll never know which kind of comparison is being performed. To minimize the risk of this kind of bug, you should always declare primitive values as primitives, not as wrapper types.

uncle_alicea at 2007-7-12 10:23:57 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...
# 3
Hi,Thanks for all, now i see the things more clear !!Thanks again
kerulea at 2007-7-12 10:23:57 > top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...