Boot from SAN, why? what is the recommendations?
What is the recommendation for doing boot from SAN?
I have /,/var,swap partitions, with of them is recommended to put on the SAN for sure?
Generally, what are the advantages and the disadvantages for using boot from SAN?
As I see it, the big advantage to create /,/var on the SAN because it is good for DRP/DRO for copy those's luns on a backup site, which have the same server(hardware).
I checked also the performance, and it seems that the i/o performance was improved after I moved to boot from SAN.
NOTE: my SAN is McData4700 and AMS-500(HDS storage with 2GB cach)
[607 byte] By [
shayberya] at [2007-11-27 3:18:55]

# 1
> What is the recommendation for doing boot from SAN?
Some organizations like it because it provides complete separation between a host and the data. So if the host needs to be replaced, another can be substituted that boots identically.
> I have /,/var,swap partitions, with of them is
> recommended to put on the SAN for sure?
Depends on who you're talking to. I don't think most people or organizations are set up to do SAN booting, but you can do it if you have the correct tools.
> Generally, what are the advantages and the
> disadvantages for using boot from SAN?
Greater complexity, greater dependence on identical hardware, provides separation between hardware and data.
> As I see it, the big advantage to create /,/var on
> the SAN because it is good for DRP/DRO for copy
> those's luns on a backup site, which have the same
> server(hardware).
Yes.
> I checked also the performance, and it seems that the
> i/o performance was improved after I moved to boot
> from SAN.
Probably. But the contents of your OS disk aren't normally a performance bottleneck in most workloads (and if they are, you're probably storing the data incorrectly).
--
Darren