fsck after 9_Recommended install?
[255 byte] By [hboswella] at [2007-11-26 20:09:35] 
I installed the 9_Recommended patchset, and had to fsck both / and /var after the patchset installation. Has this happened to others? This was on a small test server, but now I'm a little leery of installing that patchset on my production servers.
# 1
No. It will not happen for all the machines. You might have abruptly cancelled the OS. That's why its asking for fsck. Otherwise it couldn't have asked that.Thanks,Vasanth.Vasanthana at 2007-7-9 23:12:43 >
# 2
No. It will not happen for all the machines. You might have abruptly cancelled the OS. That's why its asking for fsck. Otherwise it couldn't have asked that.Thanks,Vasanth.Vasanthana at 2007-7-9 23:12:43 >
Solaris Operating System New Topic
- failed installation of the lastest 10_Recommended
- Ultra E450 and OS 5.10 compatibility
- failed installation of the lastest 10_Recommended
- Verify TZ settings
- Using Swap space
- Patch 121081-06 (sparc) is broke and Patch 121082-06 (x86) too
- are all versions of CVS,PVCS compatible with solaris 5.10?
- Open Solaris Distribution Development
Solaris Operating System Hot Topic
Solaris Operating System
All Classified
- Archived Forums
- Enterprise & Remote Computing
- Java Essentials
- Desktop
- Core
- Solaris Operating System
- Security
- Database Connectivity
- Java Mobility Forums
- Web & Directory Servers
- Development Tools
- Application & Integration Servers
- Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
- Other Topics
- E-Mail, Calendar, & Collaboration
- Developer Tools
- General
- Administration Tools
- Sun Hardware
- Storage Forums
- Java Enterprise System
- StarOffice
- Open Source Technologies
- BigAdmin
- Real-Time
- Java Coding