Separate libstdc++.so.6 runtime?

Are there any recommendations on how libstdc++.so.6 and libgcc_s.so.1 should be deployed independently of the compiler packages? Having to install the compiler suite to support applications at runtime is somewhat cumbersome...Thanks,Barrie
[267 byte] By [BarrieSpencea] at [2007-11-26 19:58:11]
# 1

> Are there any recommendations on how libstdc++.so.6

> and libgcc_s.so.1 should be deployed independently of

> the compiler packages?

These two are standard gcc libraries. You can ship them as binaries as long

you inform the user about their license and satisfy GPL requirements like availability of source code, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html

Sometimes older/newer version is also good enough.

For example:

libgcc_s.so.1 from /usr/sfw/lib/ pre-installed on all Solaris 10 and 11 is usually satisfactory.

alexey_a at 2007-7-9 22:53:41 > top of Java-index,Open Source Technologies,OpenSPARC...
# 2
I guess I should have been less vague. :) Is there any chance that a distributable runtime library package could be provided with the compiler suite?
BarrieSpencea at 2007-7-9 22:53:41 > top of Java-index,Open Source Technologies,OpenSPARC...
# 3
Thank you for the idea! We'll certainly consider providing such package, but may be not in the upcoming GCCfss 4.0.4 which should be available end of this month.
alexey_a at 2007-7-9 22:53:41 > top of Java-index,Open Source Technologies,OpenSPARC...