> I agree. But up until the last year or so, most of
> the machines I have seen with Xp only had 256, and
> some only 128MB .
...and that's the reason that I doubt the 240 MB of RAM. It's probably 256 or more. He might also be talking about disk space free or size of hard disk in GB.
Kaj
> > O_o
> >
> > You only have 240 MB of RAM? Are you sure about
> that?
> > You shouldn't run Windows XP in that case.
> >
> > Kaj
>
> I agree. But up until the last year or so, most of
> the machines I have seen with Xp only had 256, and
> some only 128MB .
My computer from awhile ago had 128MB with Windows XP home. 2.66ghz processor seems way too fast for 256 RAM to me, but I don't know too much about that.
@OP: Just download the JRE.
> ...and that's the reason that I doubt the 240 MB of
> RAM. It's probably 256 or more. He might also be
> talking about disk space free or size of hard disk in
> GB.
>
> Kaj
Well he could have a video card or graphics card that shares 16MB of RAM out of his 256MB, leaving him with 240MB. I remember a friend of mine had something weird like that happening.