Home.... | log in.... | Pub my question! | Sign-up....

Java-index >> Java Essentials >> New To Java

define me what java is better then others tehnology just like .net

any body define me what java is better then .net tehnology and is so tell me why...

[90 byte] By [asim_aa] at [2007-11-26 16:22:15]

«« JDK 1.5 Tomcat 5.5
»» Swapping Elements of an Array

# 1

One of Java's selling points is that it is (in reality, mostly) compatible across different operating systems and computer architectures. Microsoft's platform supports multiple programming languages, but I think Sun supports only the Java language for the Java interpreter. Also, Microsoft's version of Java (J#) differs from Sun's somewhat.

PCUa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

top of Java-index,Java Essentials,New To Java...

# 2

J# is all-but unused these days.Yup, like most Microsoft products, buying into .NET means becoming a Microsoft shop. Not that there's anything wrong with that ...

DrLaszloJamfa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 3

> any body define me what java is better then .net> tehnology and is so tell me why...Hai, .net needs teh widows

ScarletPimpernela at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 4

Proper title: Why is .NET better than any other language? Answer: No reason.

Fasga.a at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 5

> Hai, .net needs teh widowsThere is [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29]Mono[/url]Anyway, Java is better because it attracts only the most intelligent and resourceful of programmers, as demonstrated so exquisitely on this forum right here.

Mr_Evila at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 6

> Anyway, Java is better because it attracts only the

> most intelligent and resourceful of programmers, as

> demonstrated so exquisitely on this forum right here.

Yes, it's rather like the commercials where those two guys (P.C. and Mac) have their friendly rivalry. Except I'm not quite sure I have a mental pciture of what "Jav" would look like.

DrLaszloJamfa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 7

> Except I'm not quite sure I have a mental pciture of> what "Jav" would look like.It would look sort of like you.

DrClapa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 8

> > Except I'm not quite sure I have a mental pciture> of> > what "Jav" would look like.> > It would look sort of like you.Most flattering. People describe me as looking like the love child of James Gosling and The Comic Book Guy.

DrLaszloJamfa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 9

> Most flattering. People describe me as looking like> the love child of James Gosling and The Comic Book> Guy. http://today.java.net/jag/bio/JagHeadshot.jpg

CaptainMorgan08a at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 10

> > Most flattering. People describe me as looking> like> > the love child of James Gosling and The Comic Book> > Guy.> > http://today.java.net/jag/bio/JagHeadshot.jpgYah, the peachy shirt doesn't do much for my

DrLaszloJamfa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 11

Heres a picture of me: http://uclabruins.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/morgan_kyle00.html(Not really, just what Google returned when I put in my name.)

CaptainMorgan08a at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 12

> > It would look sort of like you.

> Most flattering. People describe me as looking like

> the love child of James Gosling and The Comic Book

> Guy.

That's exactly what I meant. And you gave a pretty good characterization of Java there, so I must have been right.

DrClapa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 13

And here's a picture of me: http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38157000/jpg/_38157741_2705paul_clapham300.jpg(Also out of Google.)

DrClapa at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 14

> any body define me what java is better then .net> tehnology and is so tell me why...notice they ask "what java" not "why java". I'm going to choose to take this literally, as it makes a concrete answer easieranything from java 1.1 onwards

georgemca at 2007-7-8 22:46:02 >

# 15

plese read this http://java.sun.com/docs/white/langenv/regards

EXCEPTIONa at 2007-7-21 16:44:40 >

# 16

> Proper title: Why is .NET better than any other> language? Answer: No reason..NET is not a language.

EXCEPTIONa at 2007-7-21 16:44:40 >

# 17

> any body define me what java is better then .net

> tehnology and is so tell me why...

The main difference between Java (the technology) and .NET is portability. With Java, programs you develop become easily deployable on many different computer systems.

Other differences are minor, apart for one; Java is open source. This is a very recent change. Previously Java was owned by Sun. This can have a positive impact on the popularity of Java.

EXCEPTIONa at 2007-7-21 16:44:40 >

# 18

> And here's a picture of me:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38157000/jpg/_38157

> 741_2705paul_clapham300.jpg

> (Also out of Google.)

What a nice initiative; this is me:

http://eecue.com/images_archive/eecue-images-24500-jos.html

(ignore the ugly guys on the left)

kind regards,

Jos ;-)

JosAHa at 2007-7-21 16:44:40 >

# 19

Please guys stop "coming out". I rather keep imagining you as characters from the Muppet show.

JosAHa at 2007-7-21 16:44:40 >

# 20

> Please guys stop "coming out". I rather keep> imagining you as characters from the Muppet show.Huhhuh, huhuhuh, she watches the Muppets. How 'bout that Waldorf?kind regards,Staedtler aka Ask

JosAHa at 2007-7-21 16:44:40 >

Java programming resources: FAQs, tutorials, compiler and browser download sites, documentation, books lists, IDEs, etc.

define me what java is better then others tehnology just like .net

Java Essentials New Topic

Java Essentials Hot Topic

Java Essentials

All Classified