Clustering configuration question
Hello,
I'd like to verify that both configurations listed bellow are valid with SC 3.1 and the latest messaging server.
Configuration 1:
two nodes with SAN storage
all messaging components bin+config+log+store installed in /san/SUNWmsgsr
In case of a failure logical host and storage resource (/san/SUNWmsgsr) failover to a standby node.
Configuration 2:
two nodes with SAN storage
Messaging server is installed in /opt/SUNWmsgsr on each node
config+log+store is in /san/msgsr-data.
Messaging server configured on nodeA and useconfig was used on nodeB.
In case of a failure only /san/msgsr-data and a logical host resource failover to a standby node.
Questions:
Are both of these configurations supported? One of the deployment examples talk about Configuration1 while Admin Guide HA configuration talks about Configuration2
Could I implement Configuration 1 but have both nodes run a unique instance of message store each installed into it's own SAN directory and bind to a different virtual IP.
NodeA /san/SUNWmsg-A
NodeB /san/SUNWmsg-B
In case of a failure one node would run two instances of the store.
Thanks.
[1231 byte] By [
d-v-ka] at [2007-11-26 15:23:58]
# 1
> Hello,
> I'd like to verify that both configurations listed
> bellow are valid with SC 3.1 and the latest messaging
> server.
>
> Configuration 1:
> two nodes with SAN storage
> all messaging components bin+config+log+store
> installed in /san/SUNWmsgsr
> In case of a failure logical host and storage
> resource (/san/SUNWmsgsr) failover to a standby
> node.
>
Supported
> Configuration 2:
> two nodes with SAN storage
> Messaging server is installed in /opt/SUNWmsgsr on
> each node
> config+log+store is in /san/msgsr-data.
> Messaging server configured on nodeA and useconfig
> was used on nodeB.
> In case of a failure only /san/msgsr-data and a
> logical host resource failover to a standby node.
Supported
>
> Questions:
> Are both of these configurations supported? One of
> the deployment examples talk about Configuration1
> while Admin Guide HA configuration talks about
> Configuration2
>
> Could I implement Configuration 1 but have both nodes
> run a unique instance of message store each installed
> into it's own SAN directory and bind to a different
> virtual IP.
> NodeA /san/SUNWmsg-A
> NodeB /san/SUNWmsg-B
> In case of a failure one node would run two instances
> of the store.
Supported. Full documentation on all three come with the next version, due out in the next few weeks.
>
> Thanks.
