Anyone doesn't like something in J2SE6.0? Personally I feel that this version of Java was more on integrating Java with other tools and technologies then improving elements in the language. I could be wrong however since I still did not try the 6.0 out...
anyways .. anyone wants to comment?
regards,
sim085
As I understand Suns release system(1) Sun releases alternating versions, one "improving"(2) the language, the second improving just the APIs & VM.
I've not looked at all the features of 6 yet, but so far I like what I see. The stolen-from-JDIC stuff is very nice to have.
1) An imposable task.
2) Or in the case of Autoboxing & static imports just playing silly buggers with.
> to tell the truth, ive been using 6 for years, ive
> used it back it was called *just* 1.6, and there is
> nothing that i dont like about it.
I personally can not understand the feature that allows JavaScipt (and other scripting lannguages) to be intermixed with java ...
> infact, anyone who doesnt like something about it can
> go **** himself.
... now couldn't you just say that in other words :)
>
> just my 2 cents.
> sim,
> its is obvious to me that you do not have alteast 5
> years of java 6 experiance under your belt, so maybe
> you shouldnt talk at all..
Nop, in fact I do not have that much experience on Java .. that is why I came here asking for other people opinion on this ...
Also ... what? this forum only people with a certain level of experience can give their opinion?
regards,
Sim085
> sim,
> its is obvious to me that you do not have alteast 5
> years of java 6 experiance under your belt, so maybe
> you shouldnt talk at all..
You have 5 years of Java 6 XP? Wow, recruiters must love you. :P
Why this attack on Sim? I can see nothing in this thread that warrants it.
And what does difference does it make how many years of Java XP he has?
> sim,
> its is obvious to me that you do not have alteast 5
> years of java 6 experiance under your belt, so maybe
> you shouldnt talk at all..
So how many years experience do you need in order to post here?
also, can your psychic abilities tell how many years other people have used it or is it just limited to sim?
> its is obvious to me that you do not have alteast 5
> years of java 6 experiance under your belt, so maybe
> you shouldnt talk at all..
Why so aggressive mkoryak. Your attack is unwarranted and just makes you look stupid. I suppose you do have 5+ years of Java 6 under you belt.
> Only 1.0.2 work with our codes other java version
> seem to have many bug.
Moving to a newer version means some code changes but not because newer versions have many bugs. If you are having trouble then it is not Java, it is your code.
Why would you stay at 1.0.2? Even if that is the only way your code compiles in its present state, it sounds like you need to rewrite some/most/all of it.
> Anyone doesn't like something in J2SE6.0? Personally
> I feel that this version of Java was more on
> integrating Java with other tools and technologies
> then improving elements in the language. I could be
> wrong however since I still did not try the 6.0
> out...
>
> anyways .. anyone wants to comment?
>
Worst possible release, just a load of **** things added for no other reason than someone screaming that something else (mainly Ruby) has it.
Whoever thought up the idea of putting an entire webserver and a database server inside the JVM should be shot.
> I personally can not understand the feature that
> allows JavaScipt (and other scripting lannguages) to
> be intermixed with java ...
That's actually a rather nice feature. You can have your configuration files a javascript and execute them on yourself.
Kaj
> > its is obvious to me that you do not have alteast
> 5
> > years of java 6 experiance under your belt, so
> maybe
> > you shouldnt talk at all..
>
> Why so aggressive mkoryak. Your attack is unwarranted
> and just makes you look stupid. I suppose you do have
> 5+ years of Java 6 under you belt.
you poeple really have no sense of humor
i guess i seemed to much like a troll. ill try to be more careful in the future.
that reminds me of looking on monster.com and seeing job postings for
* someone with atleast 15 years of java experiance (this was in 2002)
> that reminds me of looking on monster.com and seeing
> job postings for
> * someone with atleast 15 years of java experiance
> (this was in 2002)
that's nothing. Saw a job requiring 10+ years of experience in the administration of Windows 2000 networks in 1999.
> you poeple really have no sense of humor
I do, I just don't see anything remotely funny in your posts.
> ill try to be more careful in the future.
Good, thank you.
> * someone with atleast 15 years of java experiance (this was in 2002)
I made this joke before :-P
> > > * someone with atleast 15 years of java
> experiance
> > (this was in 2002)
> >
> > I made this joke before :-P
>
> sadly it's not a joke... Such things pop up all the
> time in job requirements.
They didn't want to discriminate against time travelers.
> > > * someone with atleast 15 years of java
> experiance
> > (this was in 2002)
> >
> > I made this joke before :-P
>
> sadly it's not a joke... Such things pop up all the
> time in job requirements.
If it did not happen, it would not have been a joke.
