slow nfs response with 5310

We have been seeing some very slow NFS response to our two 5310's. The problem increases as we get higher levels of activity. Doing a simple 'ls' in an NFS mounted directory will sometimes hang. No errors noted on 5310. No NFS errors reported by clients.

Anybody have any thoughts on the subject? Does the 5310 have the equivalent of nfsd daemons that can be increased? Does the 5310 have any network options that can be tweaked? With most of the files being on the smaller side (mb vs the gb range), would it help to force the rsize and wsize on the client NFS mount options? If so, anybody have a recommended size for these?

What we are using the 5310's for:

- automounted home directories (not more than 30-35 users at any given moment)

- data directories for Oracle (9 and 10)

- log file directory

- web server data directory (small web site, mostly static pages)

- shared directory for PC users

How we are set up:

- Two 5310's with 3 expansion units each

- Each EU split into two LUNs

- Numerous volumes created, some spanning LUNs

- Volume sizes range from 100GB to 1TB

- checkpoint turned off

- attic turned off

- all volumes exported to UNIX clients

- all volumes shared to PC clients

- authenticating to NIS+ server

- authenticating to WINS

- NTP enabled, sync'ing to local Unix box

- 4092 MB of memory in each 5310

- 5310's attached via single RJ45 (CAT-5e) to Cisco 4503 switch, running at 1000MB full duplex

- Unix clients are Sun V890s, attached via single RJ45 (CAT-5e), running at 100MB full duplex

- V890s running Solaris 9

- 5310's running v4.11 build 12

- No other network devices between 5310's and V890's.

thanks for any help on the problem...

Leif

[1848 byte] By [zangano] at [2007-11-26 9:33:01]
# 1

I'd like to look into the 5310 related documentation when later, I am only familiar with this product through pre-sale related training. There is an NFS performance related blueprint out there as well, I think it was based NetApp equipment, but should work with your hardware, in theory at least! Additionally to that, I notice you are not listing the 1000BASE-SX interfaces on the 890s, why? What is your Cisco gigabit module and Supervisor engine? I think the WS-G5484-Cisco 1000BASE-SX will be needed for the 890s fiber optic SC interfaces. The angle I am getting at here is that you will be able to improve performance considerably by implementing Jumbo frames, this will not be possible with the fast ethernet NICs.

Additionally, can you post the X options and part numbers for the 5310 equipment you are using? Thanks.

Message was edited by:

m-lennon

mlennon at 2007-7-7 0:20:15 > top of Java-index,Storage Forums,Storage General Discussion...