Traffic not routed to default route
I have a unsecured route A (192.168.1.1) and a PIX 501 route B (192.168.1.254) -
I have all internet connectivity on route A but when I swing it over to route B then only have local LAN and that is it. Now I need to have route B because of the VPN tunnel established through the PIX .
I believe the PIX will handle all of the IPsec communications but I have focused on correcting that in the Solaris server but my noob skills are lacking and most of my brain has leaked out of my nose looking at the whitepapers.
[532 byte] By [
heavy] at [2007-11-26 10:52:11]
# 3
That looks fine.
Yes, with the route command, the effects will be immediate. But not permanent.
You will lose them next time you reboot.
but if that doesnt work, then the problem is probably at the cisco end...
But give the output of ifconfig -a and netstat -rn to be sure.
# 4
That is what I thought but it doesnt seem to make any sense, why would my v210 be the only one that doesnt pass traffic (other than Intranet) to the PIX?
All other hosts work fine, just the sun server that made be refocus my efforts on possible port blocks or ipf settings - watching with snoop all traffic seems fine - my only other solution with out vpn tunnelling is the fly the server hundreds of miles and connect it locally and tunnel to it (which I already have approval for) but something like this really gets under my skin and I can't let it go without figuring it out, kinda like giving up in my mind to use 'Plan B'
The PIX isn't doing any thing special on the local LAN side and unless the sun server for just http traffic is using some obscure port - I am going to start from the beginning and look at everything again unless I forgot or typoed something.
Thanks for your help.
heavy at 2007-7-7 3:05:00 >
