Inner class in UML

1. There is no standard way.

2. I would avoid it, as an UML-diagram should not be language-specific.

And Inner classes are java-specific.

3. Why do you want to do it?

a) represent your design ->

avoid any special notation. If the class is private, I wouldnt show it at all, if it's public, I'd represent it like a standard class.

b) document your (already coded) classes ->

If you think that showing this class as an inner class will make a benefit to the reader of the diagram, you are free to extend the standard.

Just put a legend somewhere.

phohmeyer at 2007-7-7 11:53:21 >