What are the BEST tools to develop in JAVA?

Hi everyone!

Our project is just beginning to work in JAVA. We want to buy the BEST, the modernest professional developing tools(like JAVA editor, etc).

Could any of you, gurus and specialists, recommend us what tools to order?

(P.S. What would you say about Visual J++? Is it good and why?)

[332 byte] By [nemaria] at [2007-9-26 1:31:03]
# 1
I'm currently using Borland's JBuilder and I find it nice.You could also try Forte but IMHO it is less usable.
rthomanek at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 2
You might want to look at JBuilder 5, it's very nice, but it takes some time to master some of the tools it provides.
Hoju at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 3
My choice is JBuilder too. For me it was very easy to learn Java with it. And it's free...Important question: What kind of software are you planning to develop?Regards,Martin
edosoft at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 4
Thank you.We'll develop servlets and small programs for access to database - we suport a project we've bought.And what do you think about Kawa?And Visual J++?
nemaria at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 5

I'm using Kawa right now to develop servlets, it's really easy if you set it up with lite webserver, and then you can test your servlets right from it. I also like Kawa because it has no problems finding all the paths. Kawa is very basic (and cheap), but thats why it is almost guaranteed to work with everything. I would stay away from Visual J++, CodeWarrior and stuff like that. Visual Cafe is pretty good, but it's very expensive and sometimes tries to use its own paths and does not see the system paths. I have not used JBuilder, but I am very pleased with Kawa.

Val.

valyuha at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 6
I`m using JBuilder4 Professional.(Enterprise Edition is also available.)look at www.borland.comWolfgang (KLD)
kleindinst at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 7
I have used Forte and I think its o.k. I like the source code editor and the debugger. It's a little slow at times but the price is right!
darrelln at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 8
Visual Age for Java 3.5 EE. It's simply the most robust in terms of features and flexibility. Unrivaled team development options...
HFactor at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 9

NOT Visual J++. It's nice as a coloured text editor (I use it), but don't compile with it - stick to the JDK if you go this route. Also, don't pay money for this outdated junk IDE - I got my copy free from a prof who was throwing it out. 'nuff said! :) I only use it because it's a step up from notepad and/or vi ...

cheers,

Andrew

outlander78 at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...
# 10

I've used Forte For Java and really like it... it's what I use on my home machine. At work I have IBM VisualAge for Java 3.5 EE. I really detested VAJ at first, but I've come to like some of its features. (Of course, there are other things that I really despise, but that's true of most any IDE <g>).

Fortunately, both of them have free community versions you can download and take for a test drive--that way you can make up your own mind. =)

sage_sam at 2007-6-29 1:30:02 > top of Java-index,Archived Forums,Java Programming...